HTTP/2 200 date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 02:35:08 GMT content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 vary: Accept-Encoding vary: Accept-Encoding vary: Accept-Encoding,Cookie set-cookie: __wpdm_client=a128f3f1ad7de4faf2ab56a7b746fbca; secure; HttpOnly link: ; rel="https://api.w.org/" link: ; rel="alternate"; type="application/json" link: ; rel=shortlink x-powered-by: WP Engine x-cacheable: SHORT cache-control: max-age=600, must-revalidate x-cache: HIT: 4 x-cache-group: normal cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC expect-ct: max-age=604800, report-uri="https://report-uri.cloudflare.com/cdn-cgi/beacon/expect-ct" server: cloudflare cf-ray: 718eb63fba215b17-IAD alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400, h3-29=":443"; ma=86400 NSSF Opposes USFWS Scientifically Unjustified Traditional Ammunition Ban • NSSF

Skip to content[1]
back arrow iconBack to News[2]
June 9, 2022


NEWTOWN, Conn. — NSSF®, the firearm and ammunition industry trade association, categorically rejects the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Proposed Rule (PR) published today. The Proposed Rule[3] would improperly trade access to public lands in exchange for a ban on traditional ammunition made with lead components which has no scientific basis and would disenfranchise the outdoorsmen and women who support and fund conservation.

“This is a Faustian bargain that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is proposing,” said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President and General Counsel. “The Service isn’t following the science and isn’t serving those who invest their dollars to perpetuate wildlife conservation. Instead, this Proposed Rule serves special interest anti-hunting groups to the detriment of conservation-minded hunters and anglers.”

The USFWS announced[4] new proposed hunting and fishing opportunities for game species at 19 national wildlife refuges on approximately 54,000 acres nationwide. Slipped into that proposal, though, is a phased ban of traditional ammunition by 2026. The USFWS, according to their press release, indicated that this measure is based on the best scientific data available, however no data indicates that traditional ammunition is causing population declines of any wildlife species at any of the refuges.

The anti-hunting Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) filed a petition[5] yesterday with the Department of the Interior

Read more from our friends at the NSSF